CXO Dashboard for Contract Workforce Compliance

Frequently asked questions

What KPIs does the CXO dashboard show?+

Contractor headcount and spend by site, compliance posture with open risks, OT and cost-leakage trends, invoice-versus-verified deltas, contractor scorecards, and cross-site comparisons — all computed from live gate data rather than submitted reports.

Is the dashboard real-time?+

Yes. Iddion RegX reads from the same attendance and compliance engine that runs the gates, so the headcount you see at 9 AM reflects what the readers recorded at shift change. There is no month-end compilation step and no export cycle to wait for.

Can data be exported for board reviews?+

Yes — scheduled and on-demand board exports, using the same numbers the plant sees, aggregated rather than reformatted. Because the source is one engine, the figure in the board pack matches the figure the plant head can defend.

How does leadership see cost leakage they couldn't see before?+

Leakage is invisible in aggregate because totals look plausible. The dashboard surfaces the deltas instead: invoiced headcount against gate-verified headcount, OT claimed against OT approved, and site-to-site variance on the same metrics. A plant running 15% higher OT than its peers with the same output is a question worth asking, and it only appears when sites are comparable.

Can we compare performance across plants and contractors?+

Yes. Sites, contractors, and cost centres are benchmarked on the same definitions — attendance reliability, compliance score, OT ratio, cost per verified hour — so comparison isn't distorted by each plant measuring differently.

Who can see what?+

Access is role-based: CXOs see the enterprise rollup, plant heads drill into their own site, finance sees the invoice and deduction picture, compliance sees register and licence status. Everyone reads from one dataset, which removes the reconciliation meetings that exist purely to agree on whose number is right.

What alerts reach leadership, and how?+

Exception-first: licence expiries approaching cap or lapse, compliance breaches, unusual OT clusters, and invoice-versus-attendance variance beyond threshold. Alerts are pushed rather than waiting to be found, with mobile access so a plant escalation doesn't wait for someone to open a laptop.

Does it work across multiple plants and states?+

Yes — multi-site is the default architecture. Site-level, regional, and enterprise views come from the same records, including where different states impose different statutory rules, so consolidation doesn't require normalising four spreadsheets first.

How far back does the data go?+

Historical attendance, compliance, and cost data is retained for trend analysis and statutory retention periods, so year-on-year and pre-versus-post-deployment comparisons run on your own records rather than estimates.

What does leadership actually do differently with this?+

Three things, based on how it gets used: they question OT variance between comparable plants, they see licence and register exposure before an inspection rather than after a notice, and they hold contractors to comparable scorecards at renewal instead of renewing on relationship. The dashboard's value is less about seeing more and more about the questions it makes askable.